Keep it coming 1760s2/11/2024 To this, he would add a panorama of interpretations that have come since World War II, many of which are revisions of earlier interpretations. Professor Greene divides the older interpretations into three broad categories: the Whig Conception, the Imperial Conception, and the Progressive Conception. Moreover, the events, movements, developments, and men of this time have been the subject of a great variety of interpretations and some of the most active controversies among historians. Freeman, George Washington in seven volumes. Carroll, ed., Religion and the Coming of the American Revolution Douglas S. Upton, Revolutionary versus Loyalist Peter N. Rutland, The Birth of the Bill of Rights Nathan Schachner, The Founding Fathers Leslie F. A few titles will suggest something of the depth in which it has been covered: Max Savelle, Seeds of Liberty and The Colonial Origins of American Thought Robert A. It may well be the most written about period of American history most certainly, the period has been most extensively mined for documents to collect and reprint. In addition there are biographies of most of the leading figures of the period, numerous monographs on such specialized subjects as religion, economics, ideas, and so on. There are numerous books that deal with some aspect of this period: the background to it, the coming of the revolt, the Declaration of Independence, the War for Independence, the years under the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, and the early years of the Republic. Greene has edited two extensive anthologies- Colonies to Nation and The Reinterpretation of the American Revolution-both of which are for the years 1763-1789. Books of readings cover a shorter period, too, as a rule. Alden’s The American Revolution covers the years 17751783. Morris’s The American Revolution concentrates on the years 1763-1783, and John R. Books which treat the American Revolution mostly deal in detail with only a small portion of the period. For example, Merrill Jensen’s The Founding of a Nation covers the years 1763-1776, while Forrest McDonald’s The Formation of the American Republic deals mainly with the years 1776-1790. Books which looked by their titles as if they might be appropriate did not do this. This could be attributed, in part, to the fact that I proposed to take the course down to the year 1800. There was not a textbook which dealt with the period I had in mind in a unitary fashion. One difficulty, of sorts, presented itself to offering such a course effectively. Yet another reason was an idea that there was some sort of unity within these years that warranted treating them in a separate course. Another was the belief that such a course would offer one of the best means for covering the basic political principles on which these United States were founded, covering them with sufficient detail that they would be more likely to be remembered by students than the usual much briefer coverage in broader courses. One was my long term interest in the period. Several years ago, I introduced and undertook to teach a college course called "The Founding of the American Republic." Several things moved me to do it. He is a noted lecturer and author, his latest book entitled Throttling the Railroads. Carson is Chairman, Social Science Department, Okaloosa-Walton College.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |